Legal and Human Rights Implications of Recent U.S. Visa Restrictions
Written by: Marciana Popescu
In early 2026, the United States implemented two major immigration restrictions that significantly limit access to lawful migration pathways:
- A visa issuance and entry ban affecting nationals of 39 countries, effective January 1, 2026; and
- An administrative suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries.
Although these measures differ in legal form and scope, they share common consequences: prolonged family separation, blocked access to protection, and heightened legal uncertainty for migrants and their families. Together, they signal a shift away from individualized adjudication toward categorical exclusion and delay, raising serious concerns related to the rule of law, non-discrimination, family unity, and access to protection under international human rights norms.
This briefing outlines the key features of both policies, analyzes their legal and human rights implications, and highlights practical concerns for lawyers and NGOs working with affected populations.
I. Overview of the Two Policies
A. 39-Country Visa and Entry Ban
The 39-country restriction was implemented through a Presidential Proclamation, invoking executive authority over admission to the United States. It imposes full or partial suspensions of visa issuance and entry for nationals of designated countries.
Key characteristics:
- Applies to both immigrant and selected non-immigrant visas
- Directly restricts physical entry into the United States
- Justified on grounds of national security, document integrity, and state cooperation
- Includes limited exceptions (e.g., diplomats, some humanitarian cases)
Practical effect:
For many affected nationals, lawful travel to the U.S. is effectively impossible, regardless of family ties, employment offers, or humanitarian need.
B. 75-Country Immigrant Visa Processing Suspension
This second measure suspends immigrant visa adjudication for nationals of 75 countries. Unlike the entry ban, it does not bar travel outright, but pauses processing of visas that lead to lawful permanent residence.
Key characteristics:
- Applies only to immigrant visas (family-based, employment-based, diversity)
- Does not formally restrict non-immigrant visas
- Justified by concerns related to public charge determinations and screening
- Implemented administratively, with no clear end date
Practical effect:
Applicants are placed in indefinite legal limbo, often after years of waiting and significant financial and emotional investment.
II. Key Legal Implications
A. Expansion of Executive Discretion
Both policies rely on broad executive authority, with minimal transparency and limited opportunities for individualized review. This raises concerns about:
- Lack of clear standards governing inclusion or removal from country lists
- Absence of meaningful procedural protections for affected individuals
- Limited oversight or accountability mechanisms
For NGOs, this makes it difficult to challenge decisions or advise clients about realistic timelines and remedies.
B. Erosion of Individualized Adjudication
U.S. immigration law traditionally emphasizes case-by-case adjudication, especially in family reunification and humanitarian contexts. These policies instead rely on nationality-based categorizations, treating all nationals of certain countries as presumptively risky or undesirable.
This approach:
- Undermines principles of proportionality
- Uses nationality as a proxy for individual risk
- Limits the relevance of personal circumstances, equities, or protection needs.
C. Tension with Statutory Immigration Goals
Both measures strain core principles embedded in U.S. immigration law, including:
- Family reunification as a central policy goal
- Protection for refugees and those fleeing persecution
- Predictability and fairness in visa processing
By suspending or blocking lawful pathways, the policies risk pushing people toward irregular or dangerous migration routes, counter to stated security goals.
III. Human Rights Implications
A. Non-Discrimination
While framed as neutral security or administrative measures, the country lists disproportionately affect nations in the Global South, many of which are predominantly non-white, Muslim, or economically disadvantaged.
From a human rights perspective, this raises concerns about:
- Indirect discrimination based on race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion
- Reinforcement of global inequalities in mobility
- Unequal access to protection and family unity
B. Right to Family Life
Both policies have severe consequences for family unity:
- Spouses and children separated indefinitely
- U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents unable to reunite with loved ones
- Mixed-status families facing prolonged uncertainty
International human rights standards recognize the right to family life and require states to avoid arbitrary or disproportionate interference. Indefinite suspensions and categorical bans challenge this obligation.
C. Access to Protection and Asylum
Although neither policy formally abolishes asylum, both sharply restrict access to protection by:
- Blocking travel for individuals fleeing harm
- Limiting access to humanitarian visa pathways
- Increasing reliance on unsafe or irregular entry routes
Women, children, survivors of violence, and LGBTQ+ individuals are especially vulnerable to these barriers.
D. Psychological and Social Harm
Beyond legal exclusion, prolonged uncertainty itself constitutes harm:
- Chronic stress and anxiety
- Family instability
- Interrupted education, employment, and health care access
For forced migrants, delays and exclusions compound existing trauma and displacement.
For people pursuing regular immigration paths, these changes create a definite blockage to already minimal regular alternatives.
IV. Combined and Cumulative Effects
Taken together, the two policies produce layered restrictions:
- Some individuals are entirely excluded (39-country ban).
- Others face indefinite delay (75-country suspension).
- Overlapping populations experience both barriers.
This cumulative effect transforms lawful migration into a highly uncertain and uneven process, dependent more on nationality than individual merit or need.
V. Implications for NGOs and Service Providers
NGOs working with affected communities are likely to encounter:
- Increased demand for legal counseling with limited solutions
- Heightened client distress and confusion
- Greater need for mental health and social support services
- Challenges documenting harm caused by delays rather than formal denials
Key considerations for NGOs:
- Track and document cases of prolonged separation and harm
- Provide clear, trauma-informed communication about uncertainty
- Coordinate legal, psychosocial, and advocacy responses
- Engage in coalition advocacy emphasizing human rights impacts
VI. Key Implications for Immigration Lawyers
Practice and Counseling
- Increased need for expectation management with clients facing indefinite delays
- Higher risk of legal limbo cases without formal denials or appealable decisions
- Greater importance of trauma-informed client communication
Case Strategy
- Monitor evolving exceptions, waivers, and discretionary carve-outs.
- Assess alternative pathways (e.g., humanitarian parole, adjustment options where available).
- Track overlapping impacts where clients may be affected by both measures.
Documentation and Advocacy
- Document prolonged processing delays and family separation harms.
- Preserve records for potential future litigation or policy advocacy.
- Coordinate with NGOs to elevate systemic patterns rather than isolated cases.
Ethical and Professional Considerations
- Avoid overstating likelihood of relief under vague exception standards.
- Clearly disclose uncertainty, while minimizing client re-traumatization.
- Use supervisory and peer consultation in ethically complex cases.
VII. Conclusion
The 39-country visa ban and the 75-country immigrant visa suspension represent a significant shift in U.S. immigration governance toward exclusion and indefinite delay. While legally distinct, both measures raise serious concerns for the rule of law and international human rights obligations.
For NGOs, the challenge is not only responding to immediate legal barriers, but also addressing the long-term human costs of uncertainty, separation, and blocked protection. Coordinated advocacy, documentation, and rights-based framing will be essential to mitigating harm and pushing for more proportionate, humane, and lawful migration policies.
What NGOs and lawyers can do together:
- Share data on delays, exclusions, and harms;
- Align legal strategy with human rights documentation;
- Support clients through combined legal, psychosocial, and advocacy approaches;
- Engage policymakers with evidence-based, rights-centered messaging.
What we must advocate for:
✅ Transparent country designation criteria
✅ Time-limited restrictions with regular review
✅ Expanded humanitarian and family-based exceptions
✅ Restoration of individualized adjudication
✅ Protection of family unity and child welfare
Security and the rule of law are strengthened—not weakened—by migration policies that are transparent, proportionate, and grounded in human rights. That’s what we stand for. Together!
Read More From Our Community
International Human Rights Day: Centering Dignity in Forced Migration and Social Work Practice
Marciana Popescu
On December 10 we celebrated, once again, International Human Rights Day. This is a moment to honor the breakthrough made on December 10, 1948, when, under the influential leadership of Eleanor Roosevelt, the world adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). This landmark document established a shared global promise: that every person is born with inherent dignity, equal worth, and fundamental rights that must be upheld by all nations.
Yet, as we reflect on that commitment, the rights of migrants stand at the forefront of today’s human rights challenges. Around the world, people are fleeing conflict, persecution, environmental disasters, and economic instability—often only to encounter increasingly restrictive immigration policies, barriers to asylum, and heightened vulnerability at borders. While the Statue of Liberty is still guarding our shores, the safe haven it promised becomes more and more elusive. Women, children, and families are taking incomprehensible risks to come to the US, only to face further persecution and a blunt denial of their humanity. Even when managing to cross the borders, migrant people are deprived of their basic human rights, arrested with no due process, and/or denied due process and legal representation for their rightful asylum claims.
The Hidden Struggle: Refugee Women, Mental Health, and the Housing Crisis
Susan McLaughlin
Refugee women face unique challenges when it comes to securing affordable housing, and the ripple effect on their mental health is alarming. According to research, housing affordability stress can worsen or even trigger anxiety, depression, and PTSD among refugee women (Baker et al., 2020). This is particularly concerning for those with children, who often experience a gender wealth-gap, higher poverty rates, and limited work opportunities—factors that increase the risk of evictions and displacement.
For refugee women in the U.S., housing challenges are magnified by a number of barriers including language difficulties, discrimination, and immigration restrictions. These challenges are compounded by systemic issues, such as profit-driven investors buying up housing, reducing the availability of affordable units (Solf et al., 2024). Without stable housing, the road to community integration becomes more difficult, while mental health issues worsen.
Her Migrant Hub’s Statement in Response to Trump’s Re-Election
Her Migrant Hub
To Immigrant Women Activists, Migrant Communities in NYC & the HMH Community:
This morning is heavy… The days ahead don’t carry too much light. The results of yesterday’s election roll back the small progress we made over the past four years, creating serious challenges for immigrants, women, LGBTQ+ communities, Black and Brown communities, and the environment. But one thing that cannot be taken back or destroyed without our consent, is our HMH community, nor the many communities like ours that stand with each other against bigotry, discrimination, violence, and injustice.
Enhancing Support for Migrants and Refugees with AI Translation and Dubbing Services
Kayla Straub
According to the UN Refugee Agency (UNCHR), one in every 69 people, or 1.5% of the world’s population, is now forcibly displaced-- a percentage that has almost doubled in the last decade. As individuals and families cross borders to flee persecution, conflict, violence, and human rights violations, limited or complete lack of proficiency in the local language hinders many people’s access to healthcare, employment, or legal assistance. While newly arrived asylum seekers prioritize learning English, proficiency takes time and practice, and everyday activities like grocery shopping, going to medical appointments, and taking public transportation can be frustrating when faced with communication barriers. Language interpreters provide an essential service in helping forced migrants navigate through social services. As service providers and program designers, social workers have a role in utilizing new technologies, specifically in generative AI, that can open a new world of translation services, ensuring individuals understand their rights and the types of support available to them.
We may be closer to having Airpod-like devices in our ears that instantly dub anything we say, similar to the fictional Babel Fish in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, breaking down communication barriers in ways that were once imagined as only science fiction. Companies like the London-based Eleven Labs are revolutionizing translation and dubbing utilizing advanced voice synthesis technology. By using realistic voice overs that maintain voice characteristics and are almost indistinguishable from one’s real voice, social workers, lawyers, and healthcare professionals can offer more personalized, connected care in a client’s first language. While AI can potentially be misused, it can also bridge critical gaps in social services, especially for migrants and refugees.The same company that is developing software to break down language barriers also created voice cloning software, where anyone can upload a voice, like a public figures or their own, and have it say anything. This can lead to more fraud and scams. While there are not clear AI ethical guidelines established yet, service providers also have a role in raising awareness to already vulnerable populations, like forced migrants. Empowering individuals through education can help everyone make informed decisions and safeguard personal information from possible exploitation. The potential for how it can improve communication for underserved populations should not be overlooked though, and professionals working with asylum seekers and refugees should research more innovative ways to connect with their clients, such as using AI-powered translation and dubbing tools. Service providers have the ability to build more inclusive spaces and empower forced migrants to engage fully in new communities and leverage the services available to them.
Finding Commonalities Through Case Management
Jake Schefer
I will be referring to this client as K for the purpose of keeping his identity confidential in this blog post. K came to me while I was doing case management at a non-profit in Harlem that helps to integrate asylum seekers from Africa (primarily western Africa) into New York City. I help them sign up for social benefits like SNAP (food stamps) and Cash Assistance. K came to me in need of assistance because, like many asylum seekers in NYC from the border, he can’t work until six months after he files his application for asylum. So, he needs benefits like cash assistance and food stamps to get by. He lives in a shelter in the Bronx, and what I’ve heard from all my clients who live in the shelters is that the food is crap, there isn’t much of it, and it’s not culturally appropriate. I felt an instant connection with him despite him speaking only French and no English because he was young, close to my age. When I read his case file, the first one I read since working there, it grounded me. He had protested the government as a student in his home country and had been persecuted because of it. His uncle had then been implicated in a prison break against a dictator’s orders, and K was now a target of this too. I am a student who has protested injustice by my government as well. While we live in a security state, we have certain civil liberties here, at least on paper, that are supposed to protect me and my right to dissent. It’s luck and privilege alone that sets me apart from K and his peers who bravely migrated here. I just happened to be born into a family in New York City. Had I been born in a different country, I could be an asylum seeker, now in a shelter in the Bronx with shit food and an unclear future, with a home in Africa that I may never see again.
“Use Your Privilege to Impact Your Community”: Takeaways from Migration for the Future, a UN Side Event at the Summit of the Future Action Days
Kayla Straub
On Saturday, September 21st, , Jake Shefer, a fellow Her Migrant Hub Student Intern, and I joined a crowded conference room overlooking the United Nations Plaza for a panel discussion titled, ‘Migration for the Future: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on the future of human mobility, international cooperation and sustainable development.'
Co-organized by various partners, including the NGO Committee on Migration, Civil Society Action Committee, and the Center for Migration, Gender and Justice (CMGJ), the panel took place during the last action day for the United Nations Summit of the Future. The Summit of the Future, scheduled for September 22-23, aimed to address critical challenges our world faces, including climate change, inequality, and international cooperation. The summit sought to o strengthen multilateralism and create long-term strategies for peace, security, human rights, and development through a Pact for the Future. Panelists began the conversation by echoing how the drafted Pact offers very little language on migration, a global issue that requires inclusive, evidence-based policymaking that prioritizes migrants as knowledge producers rather than mere subjects of research.
L's Story
L
My name is L., I moved in US few years ago then I applied for asylum in January 2017. I received my EAD card 185 days later.
That EAD was more than a work permit to me, it symbolized the beginning of a new chapter in my life: a better job, more opportunities, and most importantly it had an emotional value in regard of all the closed doors it finally opened.
The Pain Within
Elvira Brodskaya
Being an asylum seeker means being in constant mental pain. Is there a solution?
When I came to the US, I felt l like I'd been handed a new life. Everything seemed so new and fresh, full of opportunities I never had before. And also, everything seemed so safe.
LGBTQ+ People and Health Inequity
Tanzilya Oren
In New York City, over 50,000 people, i.e., 4% of the 8.38 million residents, identify as non-binary and transgender people. We do not know precisely the number of immigrants among this population. Alex Trifonov, a community health representative and patient navigator at NYU Langone Health, on May 11, 2022, presented on the issue of health equity at an event at RUSA LGBTQ+. What is known is that stress caused by minority status and stigma leads to chronic stress and cardiovascular problems. Chronic stress, in turn, can cause substance use and abuse, addiction, and mental health issues.
Mr.Trifonov specifically spoke about health inequity among LGBTQ+ people regarding cancer. He talked about very low levels, lower than immigrant populations, of preventative healthcare utilization among LGBTQ+ patients due to the abovementioned minority stress and consequent avoidance of medical care. At the same time, across the United States, over 80,000 LGBTQ+ people receive a cancer diagnosis every year. Lesbians and bisexual people have a double risk of acquiring cancer diagnoses. Transgender and nonbinary patients have double the chance of getting cancers caused by infectious diseases. Gay men are diagnosed with anal and prostate cancers and cancers caused by HIV younger than other patients.
Seeking Work in One's Professional Field of Expertise: Resources for Obtaining Equivalency of Credentials in the U.S. as an Asylum Seeker or Migrant
Julia
As an immigrant to the US, one’s ability to find meaningful, dignified, and safe employment varies greatly based on one’s recognized legal status. For asylum seekers who are waiting for their asylum claim to be processed, legal job opportunities are limited and risk of human rights violations is high. Although asylum policy in the US is challenging at best, in NYC there are many community organizations working to fill some of the gaps and help provide services for asylum seekers and other migrants that are eager to find meaningful, dignified, and safe employment.
Asylum seekers and other migrants face challenges in finding meaningful work for various reasons. Difficulty obtaining recognition for studies completed in their home country, limited access to educational credentials and related paperwork due to relocation, certification differences, and language barriers are among the most pervasive. Difficulty transferring professional credentials from one’s home country to the United States is a challenge preventing many asylum seekers from finding employment in which they can apply and use their expertise.
My Internship with Unaccompanied Minors: Learning About Resilience and Hope
Sandy
A group of teenage girls sat silently at three tables in the dining room. The girls wore identical gray sweatpants and sweaters but had different hairstyles. It was shortly before 9 am. They had eaten breakfast and were waiting to walk over to their classroom. The girls were small in height, had brown skin, and didn’t look very excited to head to school. Pretty much like other typical teenage girls. As I made my way through the dining room, I said, “Buenos Dias Chicas!” A few girls responded with “Buenos Dias”, some smiled back, and others remained silent.
It took a while for the girls to become familiar with seeing me three times a week. The “clients” of this department were unaccompanied children waiting to reunite with their families. Teenagers from different countries, some spoke more than one language. For the first few weeks, I’ve only listened to their stories and learned why these adolescents chose to leave their homes, how they arrived at the U.S/Mexico border, and how they were adjusting to the program. Some departed their countries for better educational opportunities; some left to search for work to support their families, and others were looking to escape violence or abuse. Many of these child migrants, however, traveled alone. And carried their traumas, alone.
Lessons I’ve Learned from Working with Asylum Seekers
Veronica
I started working with asylum seekers in September 2021 as an intern for Catholic Charities Community Services. After a series of trainings, I was ready to talk to my first client. I was nervous but excited about the prospect of being able to connect my client with essential services. Due to the pandemic, all communication with my clients was via phone and text messaging. I found it difficult at first to build a trusting relationship with someone I had not met. At the same time, it was a great challenge to overcome and a skill I now feel more comfortable using. Seeking asylum is not an easy process— it requires an individual and oftentimes, a family, to abandon their home, their personal and professional lives, their language and cultural traditions, their possessions, and most importantly their freedom. Yet, every client that I have assisted has taught me important lessons through their willingness to thrive in a completely unfamiliar country.
When I think of my clients, several words come to mind: strength, honesty, gratitude, and fearlessness. It takes incredible courage to seek asylum knowing that the process can be filled with obstacles and years of waiting. Most of my clients are young parents with a strong desire to provide a safe environment for their children. They often talk about how difficult the transition is for them but the hope of offering their children a life free from harm keeps them going. They are fearless when it comes to learning ways to care for their families, regardless of the difficulties they face. One client, in particular, asked for assistance in locating free English language courses so that he could better navigate the asylum process and help his children with their homework. Another client was motivated to get her children an education in their new country that she enrolled them in school with minimal support from me.
Asylum seekers are losing their only tangible support
Tanzilya Oren
UPDATE -- March 29, 2022: U.S. immigration agency moves to cut 9.5 million-case backlog and speed up processing: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-uscis-case-backlog-processing-delays/
Celebrating the International Women’s Day: A Way to Break Bias and Build Community
Marciana
International Women’s Day has been celebrated for over a century, its history linked to both the emancipation of women and their access to the workforce under equal conditions, AND women’s political participation through the right to vote. Recognized as the International Women’s Day in 1975 by the United Nations, it became enshrined in the UN calendar in 1977, as the United Nations Day for Women’s Rights and International Peace.
This year’s theme for the International Women’s Day is #breakthebias. What a relevant, timely topic! Not only was this day founded in relation to women’s rights AND international peace, but it is now celebrated by acknowledging that bias prevents progress and women’s rights continue to be jeopardized by layers of discrimination and oppression!
Notes from the Field: The Importance of the Term “Asylum Seeker” & How We Use It
Allison
I invite you to participate in a quick exercise with me: Open a new tab on your internet browser and go to Google. Type in “social services for asylum seekers.” Once you scroll past the ads, you will likely see a Google Maps search of nearby social service organizations. What are they? Who do they serve? Now, keep scrolling. What else comes up?
For me, living in one of the five boroughs of New York City, the top three organizations that come up on Google Maps all have the terms “refugee” or “refugees” in their title. And, when I keep scrolling, I see links to organizations and programs that specifically cater to refugees and asylees (people who have already been granted asylum). But what about asylum seekers?
Overview of Gender-Based Violence Against Women (GBVAW)
Chloe Sarantopoulos
Across the globe, 1 in 3 women–an estimated 736 million–are subjected to physical or sexual violence perpetrated by an intimate partner, or sexual violence from a non-partner-–a number that has remained largely unchanged over the past decade (WHO, 2021).
Unfortunately, this alarming statistic is likely to be significantly lower than the true figure, given the high levels of stigma and under-reporting of abuse. Gender-Based Violence Against Women (GBVAW) disproportionality affects low and lower-middle-income countries and regions, with twenty-two percent of women living in ‘least developed countries’ subjected to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in the past 12 months (WHO, 2021). The intersecting and compounding nature of violence against forced migrant women prevails across temporal and geographical contexts. GBVAW is rampant around the world and an impending cause for migration, forcing countless women and children to flee abuse at home and attempt to seek safety in a new country.
From the Shadow of Trauma to the Light of Awareness
Lilly
A few years earlier, none of this was noticeable to me… I was too absorbed by my problems and my pains… my trauma was speaking louder than anything surrounding me.
I recall this day when I was walking in the streets of NYC, and I suddenly started crying – this lady stopped by and asked how she could help, I couldn’t stop crying, I just wanted my beautiful and successful past life to come back, but I knew in my inner self that this was gone forever and that I would have to adjust and adapt if I wanted to make it.